LET THE HEALING BEGIN Read more

I switched pseudonyms between drafts and missed it on the final read through :( Read more

Same person, I switched pseudonyms between drafts and missed it on the final read through :( Read more

Same person, I changed psuedonyms between drafts. Good catch! Read more

Fixed! Welcome you to email me next time, I'll see it sooner :) Read more

Nowhere do I argue that. Read more

cool, respond to this comment by typing with one finger and your eyes closed. Read more

Not with one finger. Read more

email me? Read more

Fair points all around! Read more

HELLLLOOOOO ITS NATASSHAAAAA! I don’t think it would have been that different, do I think it was rape? Yes I do but I also think there’s a segment of the population out there, those who use FC with their love ones who would not believe this issue is cut and dry. Nevertheless, nowhere in the piece do I try to defend or… Read more

Also unclear on what an “invalid opinion” is? Read more

I think facilitated communication causes desperate people with good intentions do very strange things and I believe there are many families you still use it to talk to their non verbal sons/daughters would not put view this as a straight forward rape case. Read more

would you prefer it not be written about then? Read more

Because this is the questions before the judge / jury . And those who believe in facilitated communication could disagree. Read more

Yes and those who believe in facilitated communication might disagree with the courts ruling. Read more

Again, from my understanding, facilitators teach their clients/students/charges FC. Thus, the headline Read more

This is why I find the case so compelling. I’m not sure Stubblefield is as cynical as others might assume given how steadfastly those families who use FC insists it works even in the face of substantial evidence to the contrary. Read more

She taught him facilitated communication. Read more

It was the question placed before the court. Read more