@TheFormerJuneBronson: She actually addresses this in a very interesting way, I thought! McClure, that is. Read more
@TheFormerJuneBronson: She actually addresses this in a very interesting way, I thought! McClure, that is. Read more
@accesskathryn: Thank you, fixed — and if you send the correx to tips or me directly, it'll happen faster! Read more
@MegtheBallerina: This was my reaction, too. There is something menacing about the level of anger. I understand the "ignore it" argument, but I think there's a lot to be said for exposing without validating. Read more
Oy, the troll is strong with this one. And judging from the level of rhetoric, we've had all 4 dudes on here defending their honor. Read more
@StoneColdCrab: Touche! Read more
@brightpeonies: I think he's a retroactive winner! Read more
@LilyHammer: I thought the same thing! I didn't understand what made it "special"; it was almost like they wanted a story like this in there, just to have done it. And I'm of two minds, because I think at least it's shining light on something that's probably between the lines quite a bit (the whole concept of the… Read more
@ronniedobbs: Sure, but the Vows stories are never straight reportage: they don't get all sides of the issue, just the married couple's. I'm not defending the choice of this couple as much as laying out the debate, but I think it would have been more problematic had they *not* recognized that it was going to generate… Read more
@HidingInCanada: NSFW, while we're at it. Read more
@oatmealshrapnel: You and me both ;) Read more
@lalie (apologetic mess): Thanks, ma'am! Read more
@thevioletllama: Thanks, good reminder! Read more
@Palimpsestina: Good idea! Read more
@SydneyHighBoots: Wow! You may win Christmas! Read more
@Sadie Stein: You gluttonous snob. Read more